RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05478
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reentry (RE) code of 2X (first-term, second term or career
airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the
Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be upgraded to allow his
reenlistment in the military.
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He served on active duty for 12 years. During this time his
performance was excellent except a short period between 2010 and
2011. He was going through a very difficult divorce. He
received disciplinary action during this period; primarily,
relating to issues surrounding his divorce. His last
disciplinary action was, on 5 Dec 11 and it was his
understanding that it would be purged after six months.
He was separated in Dec 12 as a result of being denied
reenlistment. He believes his record should have been
completely cleared by his discharge date.
The applicant provides no rationale as to why his failure to
timely file should be waived in the interest of justice.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal
statement.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 18 Jul 00, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force.
On 1 Feb 05, the applicant was promoted to the grade of Staff
Sergeant (SSgt).
On 26 Sep 12, the applicant was not selected for reenlistment.
His commander listed two Letters of Counseling (LOCs); three
Memoranda for Record (MFRs); and four Letters of Reprimand
(LORs) for poor work ethics, failure to report, failing to pay
debt, unprofessional acts, and unauthorized use of government of
travel card as the reasons for his decision.
On 8 Dec 12, the applicant was released from active duty with a
reason for separation of completion of required active service
and a RE code of 2X. He was credited with 12 years, 4 months,
and 21 days of active duty service.
________________________________________________________________
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial.
DPSOA notes that In accordance with (IAW) AFI 36-2606,
Reenlistment in the USAF, states commanders have selective
reenlistment selection or non-selection authority. The
Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) considers the members
Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) ratings, Unfavorable
Information from any substantiated source, the airman's
willingness to comply with Air Force standards and/or the
airman's ability (or lack of) to meet required training and duty
performance levels. The applicant contends all his disciplinary
actions should have been purged after six months; however, he
received three MFRs, two LOCs, and four LORs for disciplinary
actions during his last reenlistment period and commanders
should consider all infractions that occurred on the current
reenlistment when determining reenlistment eligibility.
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 18 Feb 14 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After careful
consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence
of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice
to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinion stated by
the Air Force office of primary responsibility appear to be
based on the evidence of record and have not been adequately
rebutted by the applicant. Absent convincing evidence the
applicant has been denied rights to which entitled, appropriate
directives were not followed, or appropriate standards were not
applied, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-05478 in Executive Session on 18 Sep 14, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 Nov 13, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Pertinent Excerpts from Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 21 Jan 14.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Feb 14.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03836
However, his chain of command fabricated two additional LORs in order to involuntarily dismiss him from the military, and then denied his reenlistment in Mar 12. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02275
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02275 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02189
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02189 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. The raters comments state Member elected not to provide comments to the referral memo dated 24 Nov 2010. On 18 Feb 11, the applicants squadron commander did not select her for reenlistment stating she had received an Article 15 for drawing a sexual innuendo...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01103
On 23 May 12, his supervisor signed the AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating he was not recommending him for reenlistment due to his duty performance and multiple disciplinary issues. On 14 May 12, his supervisor presented him with an AF IMT 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, notifying him that he intended to place him on the control roster for his duty performance and multiple disciplinary...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01474
On 3 Jul 12, AFPC/DPSOA requested the applicant provide the documents she contends were added to her appeal package without due process. On 24 Jul 12, in response to DPSOA’s request, she stated after submitting her appeal package to the Force Support Squadron, she inquired about the status and was informed her unit had provided additional documentation (i.e. LOC, dated 7 Sep 11, LOC, dated 3 Nov 11, and a LOR, dated 2 Mar 12) to legal for their recommendation to the group commander. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01988
Any duty that requires him to report his arrest for DUI violates his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. On 10 Oct 12, the applicants commander issued him an LOR for failing to report his arrest to his security officer as required by DoD Regulation 5200.2-R, paragraph C9.1.4. On 11 Mar 13, in response to a request from the applicant, his referral EPR was amended to remove reference to the DUI, however, the EPR remained an overall 3 based upon the applicants failure to...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03589
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03589 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended as follows: His separation code JBK which denotes Completion of Required Active Service be changed. The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. The medical records provided by the applicant are noted; however, he has not...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02220
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02220 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Code (RE) be changed so he can get back into the Air Force and continue his service. According to the applicants AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, dated 1 Jun 12, his commander denied him reenlistment because he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04879
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04879 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to a 1 series. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02205
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02205 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry Code (RE) of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) be changed to 3V (Separated w/Vol Sep Incentive) so he can enlist in the Utah Air National Guard. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to...